Getty Images

The investigation into Imran Awan, Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s IT worker, has revealed a wave of abuse and fraud eerily reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s escapades with her private e-mail server.

Despite all the evidence that’s been presented regarding Awan’s manipulation of the House of Representatives IT system and the discovery of smashed hard-drives at Awan’s home connected to Wasserman Schultz, the New York Times and its fake news proxies have, not surprisingly, taken sides on this matter.

A recent piece by the Daily Caller News Foundation sums up the Times’ calculated effort to undermine the probe into Wasserman Schultz:

A New York Times article Friday dedicates the vast majority of its space to casting doubt on stories surrounding Awan by using his lawyer, Christopher Gowen, as a reputable defense for Awan. Not only does the NYT ignore Gowen’s deep ties to Clinton, which the Daily Caller News Foundation has reported in detail, but the article also attempts to cast doubt by citing theories from a no-name conspiracy theorist who supports Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders (though NYT calls him a “right winger”).

The article makes no mention of the official Fairfax court documents that Rosiak has repeatedly linked to in his multiple stories on the Awans: “‘Imran Awan threatened that he is very powerful and if I ever call the police again, [he] will … kidnap my family members back in Pakistan,’ Awan’s stepmother, Samina Gilani, claimed in the documents filed April 14 in Fairfax County, Va., in the case of Americo Financial Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Abid A. Awan and Samina Ashraf Gilani.”

Buzzfeed, another far-left outlet, followed suit:

Just as with the New York Times article, the BuzzFeed author never mentions the smashed hard drives that the FBI seized from Awan’s home, and continually uses the lawyer to cast doubt on accusations that Awan was fleeing the country.

BuzzFeed never mentions how Wasserman Schultz threatened Capitol Police with “consequences” if they did not return a laptop used by Awan. These are only a few examples of the many, many details BuzzFeed and the NYT leave out of the recent articles, which instead focus on a few people floating conspiracy theories and the defense of Awan’s lawyer.

Objectivity in reporting the news is something of a bygone era and sadly is on the verge of extinction when outlets like the New York Times (not to mention Buzzfeed) continue to operate on an ideological platform.

[Note: The article was written by Zachary Smith]